About your Search

20120925
20121003
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)
of the joint chiefs of staff and the defense secretary finally statedding the obvious. >> it was a terrorist attack. as we determined details of what took place there and how that attack took place that it became clear there were terrorists who planned that attack. that's when i came to that conclusion. >> day after or was -- >> took a while to really get some of the feedback from what exactly happened at that location. >> there was a thread of intelligence reporting that groups in the environment in western, correction, eastern libya, were seeking to coalesce but there wasn't anything specific. bill: well, peter doocy is live in washington drilling down on the specifics. peter, if the administration knew it was terrorist attack in 24 hours, why did they not just say that? >> reporter: we heard from administration officials there is ongoing investigation and more details will come out after it wraps up. we learned yesterday not one fbi agent has stepped foot in fwauz gauze in the 17 days since the attack because things are too dangerous. u.s. officials internally labeled the deadly raid on t
getting squeeze. let's go forward to january 1. that's when defense department cuts are supposed to take place. 60 days in advance that november 2, warning notices are supposed to go out from contractors to their employees saying here comes some layoffs. the administration does not want layoff warnings going off right before the election. so they said to people like lockheed martin. you don't need to send these layoff warnings out. they say they are hypothetical. lockheed martin says it is the law. we must send the out the notices. the administration says if you don't send out the warnings, then we'll indem anyify you, we'll cover lawsuits that might result if there are layoffs. so the taxpayer is on the hook for not sending out these warning notices. it's pure politics. martha: it's unbelievable, frankly. either we are going to have these defense cut layoffs as a result of sequestration because nobody in washington seems to be able to come together on a budget deal. don't they have to face the ramifications of that and say we are going to have these defense cuts and that means we have t
and loose with the truth when makes claims in defense of his own record and making allegations about mitt romney, his record and the way he has run his campaign. bill: give me an example. what has he said in a battle ground state or what as he said on a tv ad that has been disapproved? >> he made a claim that got four pinnochios from "the washington post" yesterday that 90% of the debt was run up under his predecessor. the david letterman interview that president obama gave last week on the debt and deficits was a veritable panoply of things that were at least misleading, and often just flat-out untrue. i think the president didn't get called on it. there were many more misleading statements in the 10 minute interview that president obama gave david letterman than anything in paul ryan's speech which as we saw led to the this explosion of fact-checking. bill: don't all politicians kind of take the truth and bend it a little bit, stretch it out for their own advantage? >> yes. that is an understatement. they do it all the time. everybody on all sides does it. and i think, you know, to a ce
a massive operation. the attorney general's defense is i don't know? sorry, that not way it's supposed to work. bill: 22 minutes before the hour. growing calls for the u.s. ambassador susan rice to step aside after a tidal wave of criticism on her reaction to the attacks in benghazi. does that problem stop there or does it go beyond the u.n. ambassador. harris: get your popcorn ready. president obama trying to lower e -- tryingto lower ex peck taia way some pundit.are calling comical. >> i know what it means to be poor and i know what it means to see people who are unemployed. are you receiving a payout from a legal settlement or annuity over 10 or even 20 years? call imperial structured settlements. the experts at imperial can convert your long-term payout into a lump sum of cash today. resulting in unexpected power and agility. introducing the all-new, all-powerful gator rsx 850i. sixty-two horsepower, a fully independent multilink suspension and a top speed of 53 miles per hour. it's a whole new species of gator. see just how much the gator has evolved at johndee.com/gator. martha:
overseas by gutting the military with the president's devastating defense cuts, byee kweu by equivocating when you speak overseas on these issues it proceed skwrebtproceed investigates weakness. and when we do that they are more likely to attack us and aur allieour allies are less likely to address us. martha: you have mahmoud ahmadinejad and morsi up today to speak at the u.n. he smoke on the attack about the embassy in cairo. >> the world we live in is not unique culture. as a muslim i believe that the reason for our diversity is for us to compete in doing good. to understand one another. if we wish to coexist and prosper we must do so by living together rather than by seeking to dominate one another. martha: morsi went onto single out russia and china for backing the bloodshed he believes in syria, and israel for the starvation that is so present in gaza. bill: we'll watch what he says and what we talked about last time with mahmoud ahmadinejad speaking today. let's go to headlines. a new world order yesterday, good luck with that. governor romney accusing the president of not being ho
them, as if terrorist attacks on the one hand and legitimate self-defense on the other are equivalent. and it's that moral equivalent see that i think running throughout the speech is a very good idea of barack obama's view of the world, and one where america's place in it is not what most americans think it should be. martha: ambassador bolton i want to draw your attention to another section of the speech, it was the one place where president obama sort of put the events that we're seeing in the middle east in a larger context, which i think a lot of people have been urging him to do in some ways. he said more broadly the events of the last two weeks speak to the need for all of us to address honestly the tensions between the west and an arab world moving to democracy. just as we can't solve every problem in the world the united states has not will not seek to dictate the outcome of tensions abroad. your reaction to that. >> that is a statement that the united states is not going to interfere whether it's in our interest to do so or not. there was one very interesting addition to the
Search Results 0 to 11 of about 12 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)